University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Reports

Home

Workforce race equality standard (WRES) report 2019

Purpose of report

The report sets out University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust’s performance information against the nine mandatory NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) metrics. The metrics cover the workforce profile, staff survey, and board composition by ethnicity. The report also details the calculations and analyses the results against each metric, with recommendations for improvements where appropriate. The report is due to be published in August 2019, in line with the NHS England mandate.

Report on the WRES indicators

The NHS Standard Contract includes a Workforce Race Equality Standard which requires large health care providers and CCGs to demonstrate progress against nine workforce race equality metrics, including a specific indicator which looks at the ethnic composition of boards.

The nine metrics

NHS England has produced technical guidance for the NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard, detailing the requirements and how organisations should report their information against the metrics.

Baseline data has been produced for each metric together with an analysis of the results. The data for metrics 5 – 8 is based on the results of the 2016 NHS Staff Survey.

Report on the WRES indicators

Indicator 1: Percentage of staff in each of the AfC Bands 1 – 9 and VSM* (including executive Board members) compared with the percentage of staff in the overall workforce. 

*Excludes medical and dental staff
Non-clinical
 March 2018March 2019
Band 1 28.92% 28.2%
Band 2 21.86% 23.93%
Band 3 23.13% 24.63%
Band 4 20.24% 20.97%
Band 5 19.81% 21.95%
Band 6 22.45% 20.82%
Band 7 20.69% 21.35%
Band 8a 18.4% 20.34%
Band 8b 8.89% 10.42%
Band 8c 8.7% 11.63%
Band 8d 0% 4.55%
Band 9 0% 0%
VSM 0% 8%
Clinical
 March 2018March 2019
Band 1 0% 0%
Band 2 33.2% 33.18%
Band 3 24.18% 25.03%
Band 4 20.37% 22.62%
Band 5 38.6% 40.98%
Band 6 25.04% 26.46%
Band 7 14.64% 16.85
Band 8a 15.44% 16.89%
Band 8b 12.9% 11.11%
Band 8c 6.45% 8.33%
Band 8d 6.67% 5.26%
Band 9 0% 0%
VSM 33.33% 17%

Background and implications

As at 31 March 2019 there are 28.10% BAME staff compared to 26.68% BAME staff in 2018 in the overall workforce. BAME staff are underrepresented overall when compared to the local population surrounding the four hospital sites (BAME local population = 42%). BAME staff are further underrepresented in senior positions, and compared to the previous year’s data, although the Trust has seen a slight increase in BAME staff in the senior bands, the numbers are disproportionate to the overall percentage of BAME staff in the workforce. Note: the 4.55% increase in Non-Clinical band 8d relates to the gain of 1 BAME staff member (total number of staff in band 8d = 22). For VSM non- clinical posts in 2018, there were 27 VSM staff all of which were white. In 2019, this number increased to 49 VSM of which 4 are BAME.  It is a similar picture for VSM clinical posts, in 2018 there were 3 VSM staff of which 1 was BAME. In 2019, this increased to 17 VSM of which 3 are BAME. The increase in the number of VSM staff in total can be contributed to the merger and the reorganisation amongst the most senior bands.

Actions taken

There have been a number of successful actions and initiatives implemented throughout 2018/19 which include:

Indicator 2: Relative likelihood of staff being appointed from shortlisting across all posts

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
1.65 1.68


The information taken from NHS Jobs shows there have been more BAME applications (55%) than White applications, (45%) for all positions across the Trust. However, even though there are more BAME applicants than White applicants, the numbers appear to even out at the point of shortlisting with 48% BAME candidates shortlisted and 52% White candidates shortlisted. Yet despite the relative even number of BAME and White candidates shortlisted there appears to be twice as many White candidates appointed (64%) compared to (36%) BAME appointments.Background and implications

When compared to the analysis of national data undertaken by the National Workforce Race Equality Standard Team for all NHS Trusts, the average across healthcare providers is 1.60 times greater, which is representative of the data for UHB.

Actions taken

The Trust recognises that further investigation is required in order to understand the reasons for the disparity between shortlisted and appointed BAME applicants, however, a number of actions have been implemented to address the disparity in the recruitment and selection figures including:

Indicator 3: Relative likelihood of staff entering the formal disciplinary process, as measured by entry into a formal disciplinary investigation. 

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
1.24 1.06

Background and implications

Nationally BAME staff are twice as likely to enter formal disciplinary processes and be disciplined for similar offences than White staff. The Trust recognises that further investigation is required in order to understand the reasons for the disparity between the relative likelihood of BAME staff entering a formal disciplinary investigation. 

Actions taken

There have been a number of actions implemented over the most recent 12 months including:

Indicator 4: Relative likelihood of staff accessing non-mandatory training and CPD.

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
0.93 0.95

Background and implications

Results based on the data taken from Easy Learning, as of March 2018, suggest that BAME staff are more likely to access non-mandatory training.

Actions taken

A number of actions have taken place over the past year which includes:

Each of the following four indicators compares the outcomes of the responses for White and BAME staff. The results are taken from the Trust’s National Staff Survey Results 2018.

Indicator 5: Percentage of staff experiencing harassment, bullying or abuse from patients, relatives or the public in last 12 months

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
BAMEWhiteBAMEWhite
27.09% 27.19% 24.70% 25.40%

Background and implications

The results for BAME and White staff indicate a similar experience of harassment, bullying or abuse from patients. The data shows there has been an increase in the percentage of BAME staff and White staff reporting harassment, bullying or abuse from patients since the previous year.

Actions taken

During the last 12 months the Trust has:

Indicator 6: Percentage of staff experiencing harassment, bullying or abuse from staff in the last 12 months

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
BAMEWhiteBAMEWhite
25.73% 23.44% 28.00% 25.10%

Background and implications

The results for BAME and White staff indicate a similar experience of harassment, bullying or abuse from staff. The data shows there has been a slight decrease in the percentage of BAME staff and White staff reporting harassment, bullying or abuse from staff since the previous year.

Actions taken

The Trust has carried out the following actions during the last year:

Indicator 7: Percentage believing that the Trust provides equal opportunities for career progression or promotion

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
BAMEWhiteBAMEWhite
67.52% 82.64% 69.20% 85.60%

Background and implications

Whilst there has been a slight decrease for both White and BAME staff in the reported belief that the Trust provides equal opportunities for career progression, the percentage of BAME staff is significantly lower than the percentage of White staff. The implications maybe that BAME staff may not put themselves forward for career progression.

Actions taken

During the last year the Trust has implemented a number of actions which include:

Indicator 8: In the last 12 months have you personally experienced discrimination at work from any of the following: Managers/Team Leaders or other colleagues?

Data for reporting yearData for previous year
BAMEWhiteBAMEWhite
14.55% 6.39% 14.60% 7.40%

Background and implications

The proportion of BAME staff saying they have personally experienced discrimination at work from their manager, team leader, or colleague has remained the same as the previous year. However, the number of BAME staff is over double that of White staff which is disproportionate to the overall number of BAME staff in the workforce.

We have a disconnect between National Staff Survey data in this area of reporting and Trust internal reporting that needs further exploration. This suggests BAME staff are not actively reporting discrimination via Datix when it occurs during their day to day work life.

Actions taken

Indicator 9: Percentage difference between the organisations' Board voting membership and its overall workforce

UHB Trust Board consists of 24 members of which 2 are BAME (both of which are Non-Executive Board members)

BAME voting Board members has remained the same as the previous year with 2 members who are BAME. However, the overall BAME representation on the Board is disproportionate to the overall BAME workforce and the BAME local population. It should be noted that the Trust has a very stable management structure at senior level which leads to few opportunities becoming available for staff to progress to higher grades. The recent merger provides the Trust with a broader opportunity for staff mobility and increases the specialities in which they can work.

The Trust has taken the following actions:

Next steps for 2019/20

Following the merger, inclusion at UHB is the responsibility of the Executive Chief Nurse. Under her direction the Inclusion Team will work on developing our inclusion strategy and work plan which will provide robust governance and measurable objectives in order to enable change for staff and patients particularly from our underrepresented groups.

This will include:

Deliver a seminar to Trust Board on Inclusion

The Executive Chief Nurse, supported by the Inclusion Team, will deliver a seminar to the Trust Board on Inclusion in order to raise awareness and improve understanding. The seminar will provide reassurance to the Board of the activity undertaken in the Trust to reinforce inclusion and foster a culture of acceptance. This will include details of the statutory inclusion reporting requirements, staff training and initiatives and ways in which staff are able to be seen and heard by the Trust Board through the governance structures in place.

Responsibility: Executive Chief Nurse.

Trust Board approval of the Inclusion Strategy

The Executive Chief Nurse, supported by the Inclusion Team, will present the Inclusion Strategy and objectives to the Trust Board for approval. The newly developed inclusion strategy will include WRES, WDES, EDS, Stonewall, Gender Pay Gap and measurable objectives to be achieved over an agreed timeframe.

Responsibility: Executive Chief Nurse.

Changing the way we make decisions on application of the disciplinary process.

The introduction of a senior review panel for all employee relations casework will review all cases and includes individuals with a key protected characteristic or where the case relates to a protected characteristic. It will mean reviewing allegations and initial facts before any casework is commissioned to determine whether formal action is justified and equitable and there will be fortnightly reviewing of any cases that are commissioned.

Responsibility: Deputy Director of HR for Operations and Deputy Chief Nurse.

Changing the way we conduct recruitment and selection processes

A task and finish group will be established to understand better the experiences of BAME nurses in the Trust and the barriers they are experiencing to career progression. Alternative methods for selection, rather than sole reliance on the traditional interview, will be explored such as assessment centres for nurse promotions and high volume nursing recruitment.

Responsibility: Deputy Chief Nurse.

The Trust will explore innovative ways of selection which will reduce the emphasis on the face to face interview. This will involve working with national and local partners to share best practice and implement new ways of conducting recruitment and selection in the Trust. In addition, to attract recruit and retain from a more diverse pool of talent the Trust will forge links with key community stakeholders and showcase UHB as an inclusive employer of choice.

Responsibility: Head of Inclusion and Deputy Director of HR.

Increase knowledge, skills and confidence for senior and middle management

The Trust will develop a comprehensive inclusion training offer for leaders in the Trust to increase confidence and the use of discretion.  This will include a focussed inclusion programme to ensure equality of access to training and development opportunities including Nursing Associates, Specialist Practice and leadership roles. The Trust will develop a portfolio of internal leadership programmes which will be available to all staff and will provide the knowledge, skills and confidence to advance in their careers.

Responsibility: Head of Inclusion and Head of Staff Experience and Deputy Director of HR.

Extend and develop the Trust’s staff networks including the BAME staff network

The Trust will extend and develop the staff networks as a source of advice and support for staff as well as a forum to consult, influence, inform and celebrate change. This will involve formalising the role of the network groups, the Chairs, and setting measurable objectives and outcomes.

Responsibility: Head of Inclusion.

The Trust will monitor and measure the performance against these specific objectives through the WRES and quarterly reports presented to the Inclusion Stakeholder Steering Group.

Delivering the best in care
Back to top